Quantcast The Trinitonian
College Media Network

Current Issue:

Acclaimed ESU duo debates TU

Alistair Cormack, Alex Just stop at Trinity as part of 3 month, 32 school tour

Eric Washburn

Issue date: 10/26/07 Section: Trinity Life
FROM ACROSS THE POND: The Oxford debate team met in the Skyline Room to take on the Trinity Debate Team. Alex Just (left) and Alistair Cormack traveled to Texas to take on Martha King, senior, in a debate about the benefits and drawbacks of the United States remaining in Iraq.
Media Credit: Eric Skoglund
FROM ACROSS THE POND: The Oxford debate team met in the Skyline Room to take on the Trinity Debate Team. Alex Just (left) and Alistair Cormack traveled to Texas to take on Martha King, senior, in a debate about the benefits and drawbacks of the United States remaining in Iraq.

Two of Europe's premiere debaters visited Trinity University Thursday evening, October 25 as a part of the English-Speaking Union (ESU) United States debate tour.
The event, part of a three month tour of 32 U.S. colleges, brought two?members of the Trinity community head to head with the European team in a debate centered on the United States' current involvement in the Iraq conflict.?The event marked the first debate of this kind ever to appear at Trinity University.
ESU debaters Alex Just and Alistair Cormack defended the position that all U. S. troops should be withdrawn from Iraq, citing the effects of the war on the U.S. economy and the destructive effects of the U.S. military presence on Iraqi independence.? Trinity's representatives, Assistant Professor of Speech and Drama and Director of Debate Jarrod Atchison and Senior Martha King, argued against this resolution, claiming that the U.S. military presence is actually constructive, and that, as the instigators of the conflict, there is a moral responsibility to remain to the end.
The debate differed from most traditional academic debates.?Instead of lasting for the typical two and a half hours, the debate was shortened to one hour and consisted of four constructive speeches, four cross examination speeches and two rebuttal speeches.?No panel of judges was present to determine a winner; instead, the debate was constructed in order to inspire dialogue among audience members, Atchison said.
"We put this together as a public debate," Atchison said.? "We wanted to encourage conversation afterwards; audience members can decide amongst themselves who the winner was."
First Year Patrick Garretson, a member of Trinity's debate team, and First Year Emmett Crockett said that the British debate team was amazing, and that their critical and analytical abilities were incredible compared to others they had seen.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What would you like the Tigers' Den space to be?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement